[Review] XTAR 1.5 V 1620 mWh AAA batteries

XTAR upgraded their (previously green) 1.5 V regulated Li-ion based AAA batteries (we need a better term for them). Now they are blue-white and come with 1620 mWh instead of 1200 mWh.

You can find the German version of this review on my website: SammysHP Blog › XTAR 1,5 V 1620 mWh AAA Akkus und MX4

The batteries were provided by the manufacturer for this review. Thank you very much!

Overview

The official name for this product is “XTAR AAA Lithium 1620mWh Battery”. The contest for a better name is now officially open!

More or less the same size as regular AAA batteries: 44.4 mm in length and 10.3 mm in diameter. With a weight of 8.9 g they are slightly lighter than common NiMH batteries.

Dimensions and weight are identical with the previous version in green. The positive terminal is slightly longer, but the total length is the same.

Discharging

A special feature of many XTAR batteries is their low voltage indicator: When the battery is “almost” depleted, the voltage jumps from 1.5 V to 1.1 V to allow devices to show a low battery warning. This only works if the device still operates at that voltage, though! This kind of batteries is mostly used with devices that require a higher voltage than 1.2 V NiMH batteries.

The batteries have a rating of 1620 mWh – a huge improvement compared to the previous version with only 1200 mWh. Unfortunately my measurements were ranging from 1000 to 1300 mWh depending on the load. Even considering the conversion loss, this appears to be less than advertised. It is more than the previous version, but the additional energy is only available at the reduced voltage of 1.1 V.

They are officially rated for 2 A continuous discharge. At that current the capacity is already significantly reduced (623 mWh). I was able to get up to 3 A for a short time. At higher current the output voltage dropped.

A huge problem with this kind of batteries is the electrical noise from the integrated switching regulator. There’s not much space for filtering and the regulator is run at high frequency. This causes issues with some devices like radio receivers or radio-controlled clocks.

Charging

Charging requires a special “charger” – which is not much more than a battery holder that applies 5 V to the terminals. The actual charging controller is integrated in the batteries. During charging an indicator LED in the batteries is blinking green.

Nice charging with around 250 mA. Unfortunately there’s no way to check the voltage of the internal cell without unwrapping it.

Conclusion

Overall a nice battery for situations where 1.2 V from a NiMH battery is not enough. Most of the time the XTAR AAA batteries will output constant 1.5 V. They switch to 1.1 V to indicate a low state of charge.

Unfortunately they still have a lot of electronic noise that causes malfunction of some sensitive devices. Also their measured capacity is much lower than their rating.

4 Thanks

Thanks for your review!
What do you think about low current situations where an alkaline would last a year?
Wireless thermometer for example.

They have an unknown amount of self discharge. Does the device work with regular NiMH? Then use them. Otherwise it’s a simple cost calculation. If you just need one set of Alkalines it would be less expensive than using these 1.5V Li-ion batteries.

You should check first if they work. My thermometer receiver wasn’t able to find any sensors when using these batteries.

1 Thank

I bought some AAs for a similar use. Besides the radio frequency interference ( I never tried them), the self discharge was my main concern. Some of my sensors are in hard to get to places and have 4 tiny screws that need to be removed to change cells. I found this from Xtar:

"When the cells are stored in the fully-charged state, the self-discharge rate typically remains below 5% per month. If the internal cells are stored with the voltage below 3.6V, (no way to check this) the self-discharge rate is less than 3% per month. You can rest assured that these 1.5V Li-ion batteries won’t get over-discharged within one year of your purchase. … Besides, please remember to charge these batteries at every 6 month during long-time storage."

That is just too high if one wants to try to power a device for a year. Or probably for even 6 months. They are closer to what the old NICD and non-LSD NiMH cells behave. Charge them up and use them immediately. Recharge as needed. Probably just fine for many applications, but not remote sensors where you want cells to last for months or a year… IMHO.

1 Thank

Have you ever found or tested any AA/AAA batteries that can hold for more than 2 or 3 months at least for a wireless thermometer ? I’m running into a similar issue, but in my case, accessing them is convenient, although changing my AAA Eneloops every so 1-1.5 months is not that convenient.

I hope you enjoy your stay, fbsoft!

I think that may depend a LOT on the make and model of the thermometer.
I have a VERY old Accurite (2xAA main.1xAAA sensor). It’ll run 1year+ on alkaline, 6 months+ on good NiMh but give a low battery warning for a long time, and 6 months+ on quality 1.5v LiAA/AAA.
(note-changing the batteries is not a big deal. Reprogramming this one is a hassle)
I have a much newer ThermoPro (2xAAa main and sensor). It seems harder on batteries.
Both stations have essentially the same data.
Some of the ‘elite’ stations look like major power hogs with all the data and pretty screens they have.

I don’t trust alkaline for extremely long term use in devices (leaks), and didn’t want to bother with NiMh or 1.5v Li, so went to Energizer Ultimate Li primaries (expensive). They last a long time, don’t have potential hassles with interference, and (almost) never leak.

I use AAA/AA Energizer Ultimate Lithium cells for remote temp sensors. I know they are expensive and maybe an inefficient use of resources. But for the length of time they run in these low drain applications (well over twice as long. Almost 3 times, compared to Eneloops) and the range of temperatures they work at (some of my sensors are outside . It can get pretty cold here) I just use them and call it good. Everything is a trade off.

I am in the process of checking some Xtar AA 1.5v LiIon cells in a clock. They have been doing fine so far. I put them in last March when DST started. But NiMh cells would typically have been OK after 5 months as well in this clock. It works to well below 1 volt per cell.

Thanks guys for the infos !
I don’t mind paying a little bit more for a rechargeable battery, as long as it does hold up better than others. In my country 1 xtar AAA 1.5V 1680 mWh = 4 Energizer Ultimate Lithium, so i think it’s ok for it’s value :slight_smile:, but it’s not rechargeable. This is the first winter with these devices so i imagine the cold will severely affect the performance of the current Li Batteries i use.
@flydiver, i recently started with sensors and IoT devices albeit they are on WIFI and consume more than the zigbee devices, but the downside, all of these are all very sensitive to the 1.5V reading of a battery rather than 1.2V. When i plugin the Eneloop i get ~30% battery level. It lasts, for the mentioned period, but colder nights i saw a dip when it was at 15% charge detected.
I have tried ECB 1.5V AAA batteries with the built in charger, and they report 100% when plugged in, but those are very expensive… compared to Eneloop, they lasted 2x more though so that’s a nice thing, but it came at a cost.
These batteries i know they are an investment, and i plan on using them for as long as possible in all devices, until they die of old age and usage, so spending a bit more doesn’t bother me, but, i do want them to work as expected.

Keep in mind that LiIon cells drop off in performance at low temperatures… by a lot. The Xtar cells claim to work down to -20C. But their capacity will be very compromised starting much higher. In fact temperatures below 0C can freeze the electrolyte causing permanent damage to the cells.

The energizer Ultimate cells are rated to -40C. Just for reference . I had temperatures at around -30C last winter. My outdoor sensors continued to work using them.

All of the options have pros and cons, you just need to decide what is most important for you and go from there.

As an aside, this may be interesting to you: