[Review] XTAR AA 1.5V 4100mWh USB-C

Some time ago, I have reviewed an AA battery from XTAR, which is based on Li-ion technology with an integrated voltage converter. There is now a successor that comes with an integrated USB-C charging port, called “XTAR AA 1.5V 4100mWh USB-C”.

You can find the German version of this review on my website: SammysHP Blog › XTAR AA 1.5V 4100mWh USB-C

The batteries were provided by the manufacturer for this review. Thank you very much!

Different types of AA batteries

There are various battery types in the AA/Mignon size, which differ from each other in several details.

The classic: the alkaline battery (alkaline manganese, also known as “alkaleak”). A new battery has a voltage of around 1.5 V, but it drops continuously when discharged. It tends to leak, often damaging devices. It is also not suitable for high current output. On the other hand, it is particularly inexpensive and is therefore comes often bundled with new devices.

NiMH batteries, especially of the LSD type (Low Self Discharge), have advantages in almost all respects. As they can be recharged hundreds of times, they are more environmentally friendly and significantly cheaper than batteries in the long term. They do not leak and can deliver comparatively high currents. Their voltage drops quickly to around 1.2 V, but is then maintained for a long time. They are normally the preferred type.

In some cases, lithium primary batteries are advantageous. They are very lightweight, have a high capacity, can be stored for a long time and still work at very low temperatures. Their voltage is slightly higher at around 1.7 V, but most devices can cope with this. The disadvantage is their high price. They are well suited for devices with low power consumption or at low temperatures, such as wireless outdoor thermometers.

Similar in name, but completely different: Lithium-ion (Li-ion) rechargeable batteries, which are available in the same size as AA batteries (then called “14500”). When fully charged, they have a voltage of 4.2 V and can therefore not be used as a replacement for the other types listed here!

A special case is the battery type shown in this article, the Li-ion battery with 1.5 V regulator. This is a Li-ion battery that is equipped with a tiny, integrated voltage converter. This generates a constant 1.5 V from the 2.7 – 4.2 V of the Li-ion battery. This type always makes sense when devices have problems with the low voltage of NiMH batteries or partially discharged alkaline batteries. The disadvantage is the higher price.

XTAR AA 1.5V 4100mWh USB-C

The batteries are available as a set of four and come with a container for storage and a charging cable.

Detailed specifications can be found on the manufacturer’s website. The batteries have the size of a normal AA battery (50.3 mm long and 14.3 mm in diameter) and weigh just 20 g, almost a third less than a NiMH battery.

Nominal energy: 4100 mWh
Nominal capacity: 2450 mAh
Nominal voltage: 1.5 V
Discharge current: 2 A
Charging voltage: 5 V
Charging current: 0.45 A
Operation temperature: -20 – 50 °C
Storage temperature: -20 – 50 °C
Cycles: > 1200
Length: 50.3 mm
Diameter: 14.3 mm
Weight: 20.5 g

Their energy is specified as 4100 mWh, which in this case refers to the energy of the internal Li-ion battery. The voltage converter introduces losses, which means that a little less is available at the end. 2450 mAh, on the other hand, indicates the actually available capacity. In comparison, LSD NiMH batteries only have around 2000 mAh, and at a lower voltage.

Discharging

The batteries were discharged with an electronic load with a current from 250 to 2000 mA. The process was recorded using a four-wire measurement.

At a discharge current of 250 mA they achieved 2529 mAh, which is even 79 mAh above the manufacturer’s specification. Even at 1000 mA, they still come very close to their nominal capacity.

Here you can see one of the special features of these XTAR batteries: they do not provide a constant voltage of 1.5 V all the time and then suddenly switch off, but drop down to 1.1 V for the last 20%. This is intended to trigger the battery warning in devices so that the batteries can be replaced at a suitable time. On the other hand, this type of battery is used in devices that hardly work or do not work at all with low voltage.

According to the specification, the batteries are suitable for a continuous discharge current of up to 2 A. In the test the voltage dropped when reaching 3.3 A. However, at this load the batteries become quite warm already,

A problem with this kind of batteries is the electrical noise from the integrated switching regulator. There’s not much space for filtering and the regulator is run at high frequency. This causes issues with some devices like radio receivers or radio-controlled clocks.

Charging

Until now, a special charger such as the XTAR VX4 or the simpler XTAR MX4 was required for batteries of this type. However, the charge controller is usually integrated into the batteries, making the “charger” little more than a battery holder that supplies 5 V to the battery terminals.

This method still works with the new XTAR batteries. However, now there is also an integrated USB-C port, which can be used to charge the batteries directly without special hardware.

If you only want to charge a single battery, you can use a regular USB-C cable, same as you would use to charge a smartphone, for example. To charge several batteries at the same time, a special cable with a USB-A plug on one side and four USB-C connectors on the other is included in the set.

The charging current is around 470 mA for each battery. The USB power supply should therefore be able to supply at least 2 A for four batteries. During the charging process, a green LED flashes in the positive terminal of the battery, after completion it lights up constantly. In this state, only 360 µA are drawn through the charging cable.

The technical implementation is extremely simple: the USB port is connected directly to the terminals of the battery and thus powers the integrated charge controller in the same way as the aforementioned “charger”. This fact can also be used in a creative way: If you cut off a USB cable and connect it to the battery, the regulated voltage of 1.5 V is available at the wires - saving you a battery holder.

Conclusion

Even if NiMH batteries are almost always the right choice – in some situations you need an alternative. The new XTAR AA 1.5 V rechargeable batteries are a successful upgrade of their predecessor and now have an integrated USB-C port for charging. Thanks to the integrated voltage regulator, they deliver a constant 1.5 V for the majority of the runtime and a drop to 1.1 V at the end serves as a battery warning.

Another positive aspect is the manufacturer’s honest capacity claim. With a discharge current of 250 mA, the battery even exceeds its specification. The available capacity of 3600 mWh is significantly higher than that of NiMH batteries with around 2400 mWh.

The only disadvantage is the higher price and the noise in the output voltage, which can lead to problems with some devices.

7 Thanks

Yep, they’re hella handy, but in my clock/thermometer, the clock and thermometer work fine… but the switches are useless. Can’t even set the clock from its initial 12:00 to save my life.

Slap in some NiMH, works fine.

Slap the switching 1.5V cells back in… nope.

If I knew they could handle reverse-voltage, I’d use them in my cat-toys, because my NiMH cells always get at least 1 cell (the runt of the litter) at zero- or negative voltage. No such thing as low-voltage detection until the spinny-things just stop.

Electrolytics are too leaky (probably would leak more current than the doodad’s using), but wondering if a big-C low-V ceramic cap might smooth the noise to manageable levels.

The won’t flip polarity. When they are empty, the low voltage protection kicks in and disables the output.

That’s what I’m not sure of, as protection circuitry (usually just a FET) will stop the output from being supplied by the cell (forward flow supplied by the cell), and will usually accept input to charge (reverse flow to charge the cell), but reverse-charging (forward flow being pulled from outside) might just flow through the FET’s body-diode or something, with nothing to stop it.

It’d be nice if mfrs would specify that, eg, “safe to use with multiple cells in series”, or similar.

Typically low value caps in like picofarads are used for RF filtering. But they filter in circuit noise. Typically not radiated noise. For these you might need to filter the power out, but also shield them with some sort of grounded faraday cage. Likely not practical.
Here is a quick overview of design for RF filtering for the power line.

Just as a data point. I have several types of the high capacity LSD cells that measure over 2400 mAh capacity at 0.3 amp draw.

Just for clarity. This mWh is for the internal cell, right? You mentioned losses in the voltage converter. SO this is never really available, is that correct?

would you be willing to fully charge some of them, then set them aside for a month or two, then measure their capacity? I am really curious about real life self discharge numbers. This is perhaps the biggest reason for me not using this type of cell more widely .

Thanks for the excellent review.

It’s not RF but in the kHz range or so, less (ie, worse) at lighter loads.

Most doodads designed for battery use are expecting to see a rock-steady voltage, and have near-zero filtering and nonexistent PSRR.

Instead, it’s like driving them from an adapter with 60Hz (AC) or 120Hz (pulsed DC) hum, or worse, the o(kHz) noise from the switcher.

Throwing a cap across the power leads should be enough.


I should be able to scare up a meter with frequency counter to get the frequency, and use the AC scale to see about how much AC noise a cell might be spitting out.

If I could find one of those cells I got buried somewhere…

Let me know what you come up with… I tend to think it is the switching frequency of the converter and harmonics. I wonder what frequency they use for the switching.
I can hear noise from switching power supplies and LED bulbs (switching supplies) on portable radios and even see it on the waterfall graph on my SDRs.
So I just assumed that the issues with radio stuff was… well being radiated. I mean the “atomic” clocks seem to run fine, they just can’t receive the time signal. Remote sensors display data locally, but will not talk to the base.

I guess ripple on the DC output would affect some things. But to filter 22 K ( which is what I thought I had seen somewhere as what these cells use) and harmonics would take smaller value caps. It would be interesting to put a scope on these and see how much of that it s there. Sure, if low frequency ripple levels are high, a (relatively) big cap for filtering may well help.

3600mWh is the available energy.

Yes, there are a few high capacity models, but I took the more common regular Eneloop as reference.

The test is already running. Result will be available in approximately six months.

1 Thank

Great!!! and Thanks for doing it!

These seem to perform better the other ones rated to 4150mWh, and actually test in line with the 15% power losses I was expecting, and not 22% like the other ones. With additional circuitry too, it seems.

Old 1.5V 4150mWh @500mA discharge yielded 3261 mWh =22% loss
New 1.5V 4100mWh @500mA discharge yielded 3473mWh =15% loss

Great review as always!

**p.s. if you have the time, could you hit the old ones again at 250 mA discharge, for science?

Thanks for some more details and testing.
I’m still curious about max discharge. Does the circuitry limit the discharge to 2A @ 1.5v? What happens when something tries to pull more than 2A?

Curious about how well these would do you n ia 2,3, or 4 cell light or device trying to pull a few amps. I don’t expect 10A but 3C discharge of the LiIon cell sounds like a reasonable want.

You can find that information in my review:

Sorry, to me the review was not clear that they can be discharged above 2A. Looking again I think it says that you were able to pull up to 3.3A? Perhaps something was lost in translation.

Thank you

I thought that the chart together with this section makes it easy to understand:

Any idea how to make it clearer to understand?

according to the voltage graph in this review, at 500 mA which nearly is the standard charging current of 0,2C for the determination of the capacity = 490 mA, this battery has a distribution of 76 % of the capacity (mAh) at 1.5V + 24 % at 1.1V …

so the phase at 1.1V is even a little bit longer than that of the blue AA without USB (“4150 mwh”), that has a distribution of 80 % at 1.5V + 20 % at 1.1V … (@ 500 mA)

by this it has been possible to reach the nice “2450 mAh” for the new AA with USB …

with a shorter period at 1.1V this mark of total capacity would have been missed … like the “2500 mAh” in case of the blue AA without USB …

so the additional benefit to charge the new model by USB as well, costs a little bit capacity at 1.5V compared to the blue AA without USB … that delivers around 2000 mAh at 1.5V + 500 mAh at 1.1V = 2500 mAh in total … (@ 500 mA)

the loss due to the voltage conversion in both cases, with and without USB, is similar :

Xtar AA blue without USB : measured 3574 mWh of “4150 mWh” = ~ 14 % loss

(measured by akkuvergleichstest.de)

Xtar AA blue-white with USB : here measured 3473 mWh of “4100 mWh” = ~ 15 % loss

(both @ 500 mA)

This made me think of something related to the reasons one might use these cells. That being the sensitivity of a device to the lower voltage of NiMH cells. With the distribution above, we would potentially lose a bunch of capacity when using such sensitive devices as they would be operating at a lower voltage than the NiMH (nominal voltage) during 24% of their discharge cycle.

The claim is that the lowering the voltage will allow devices with low battery warning to notify the user in time to change the cell out(which it does). But do we need 24% of the cells capacity to do that? It is more likely, to me. that it was done to meet a set specification goal.

I use them in a multimeter that triggers the low voltage warning pretty early with NiMH, so most of the time the indicator is on. With the XTAR batteries, the indicator appears for the remaining 25%, which is enough to finish some tests for a while.

I get it. In many cases this is not a problem (I have been using NiMH cells to replace 1.5V Alkaline cell for years and have had very few problems) . Especially where a display of a low voltage warning is the only problem being addressed… But then why not just use NiMH cells that have a similar capacity and are far cheaper? In the case of devices that just will not work properly, or at all, at the lower voltage, well you can lose that 24%.

In any case, I just am suspicious that they adjusted the period that they run at 1.1 volts only to get the capacity numbers they wanted (likely the marketing department getting involved). Otherwise it could be set to drop to 1.1 volts for only 10% of the discharge cycle. It would give plenty of time for a low voltage announcement by any device, and still give longer time at the full rated voltage.

with the proposed ratio of 90 % at 1.5V + 10 % at 1.1V the blue AA without USB would have reached about 2450 mAh total capacity, with 95 to 5 % about 2400 mAh … (@ 0.2C = 500 mA)

so, in those cases, adios “2500 mAh” … :disappointed:

the same was done with the white-blue AAA in order to crack the benchmark of “1000 mAh” (for a 1.5V Li-Ion), again a distribution of 80 to 20 % …

but as I said in another thread, I don’t criticise them for that … I only describe, what the user can expect …

2000 mAh at in fact 1.5V in case of the blue AA without USB is not bad (@ 500 mA), although I personally of course would have preferred a longer 1.5V phase, too … and 800 mAh at 1.5V of the white-blue AAA “1000 mAh” still is the best I know … (@ 0,4C = 400 mA)

at lower currents the ratio of these batteries changes in favor of the 1.5V phase … at higher currents the 1.1V stage gets longer in proportion …

yes, of course … that all surely is a way of “offensive marketing within a very challenging field of competitors” … :wink: