Pretty harsh overall. Modern emitters can be pretty high CRI, at least higher than 2010. While I do not own the specific light the OP, Jan, is looking at, the LH351D single emitter flashlights I have don't have nasty tints or suffer the issues you noted.
Further, what I want out in my cow pasture and what I want in my living room is not the same. Whether the OP is in a major city with lots of light pollution, in a smaller town, or out in a rural area would affect what emitter I personally would choose.
All three emitters have positive attributes but, the temperature range of each option is what I personally focused on. A 5,000K LH351D today should have a relatively good CRI at 5,000K and a really good beam hot spot and flood for normal everyday use in an urban European town.
I have an SST-20 4,000K, predecessor to something like the 519A, and it is really nice inside a restaurant reading a menu or in a motel room looking for something in a suitcase, etc. For walking around town, a triple 519A is where that emitter really shines for me personally to get more intensity from the beam and better coverage in the flood area for seeing things like a pot hole in a parking lot at night or, crack in a sidewalk.
I stand by my original statement that the majority of flashlight fanatics prefer warmer tints. Years ago the warmer tints were the only HIGH CRI options, like my SST-20 4,000K, but today cool emitters can be HIGH CRI too. The 5,000K LH351D technically may not be Natural White but, it certainly is not overly 'cool' either.
The flashlight club meeting I came back from on Saturday had lots of warm lights. For a campfire effect, they work well. However, while most people ohh'ed and ahh'ed over them and talked about how nice the beams and tints were, they just didn't do a lot for me in a practical sense.
The 5,000K, 5,700K, and 6,500K emitters all let me see sticks in the cow pasture, lit up reflectors on the cars, and similar things very well. On this moonless night, color resolution for the green onions for the baked potatoes was great and, seeing the details of my steak was super easy.
So, in summary, I stand by my original statement that most people that are flashlight fans and collectors generally prefer warmer emitters for the campfire light effect in my experience and I am in the minority preferring something with a cool emitter. While I like my SST-20 4,000K flashlight a lot, it is a pretty limited use option for myself. Today, you don't have to get a warm emitter to get HIGH CRI either! Modern cool emitters can be HIGH CRI as well so, that is an argument of the past.
As you get older, your pupils don't open as wide as they do when young, at least for most people, so that may be part of the reason for my preference for higher intensity cool white high CRI emitters. Eye biology and use case matter a lot when looking for "the best" flashlight emitter choice. All three emitters in this flashlight have strong positive attributes so, it is not like choosing any of them is bad just that each of them are slightly better performing for certain tasks that may make one a noticeably better choice for specific people and specific use cases.
Best Regards, Sid