Recently, our R&D team has been discussing whether the IF24 series flashlight’s on/off state requires a memory mode after rotating the magnetic ring.
We hope to hear your suggestions and help us improve this series.
Here is a video link showing the current switch mode:
A power switch should act like just that - on/off for the entire device, not for specific modes, and have absolute control.
To me, not a good idea to mix metaphors, so to speak; a mode selection dial should not act as something more than that, and override the power switch.
Button – responsible for power and output level
Dial – responsible for mode selection
According to the other paradigm, the lock symbol should really be a power off symbol, and the button should act only to change levels, and not have the ability to turn the light off.
Some may like the “short cut” as illustrated in the video, but I prefer to keep them separated, logically.
On / Off / level / color changes operate by the thumbswitch only. Mode functions operate via the rotary switch. Memory, if applied, should only be active in the current mode, and automatically canceled when switching functions via the rotary. This is the way.
I agree, dial for mode changes only, button for on off/output selection. But would ammend it that memory changes with the mode selection, not cancels any set memory.
As in, when I turn off the side light in medium, and then use 2 other modes, the side light will still come back on in medium when selected again. A permanent memory for each mode so to speak.
Also,
For my preference if Any mode is On , if that ring rotates, Everything goes off. Then need button press to turn on in whatever mode is now selected. Saves you from accidentally rotating that ring from low/moon side light to high poice or disco strobe and frying your retinas
Please, in the IF24S put the glass of the side LEDs halfway between the opacity of IF23 and the transparency of IF24. And if possible, the side LEDs should be 4000/4500K