Between the two, the S12 gets you a lot more output–the CUN66A1G has comparable output to the Nichia 233B, and you get 3 of them. The Nichia 233B is not powerful enough to justify its price, and I would only go for it if you need a lot of throw (which is rare). Historically Nichia UV LEDs have had pretty high failure rates, not sure if they’ve stepped up their game.
If you want a lot of throw, SBT-10X-UV is a much better option for just a few more bucks.
Nichia UV LEDs have always been expensive historically. They tend to have more intensity and less visible emission, but the former doesn’t matter for most applications and the latter is leveled by the filter.
Both. The ratio between the two is probably similar, but the output power is just way higher
SF16 is nice because of the USB charging, but the S12 has a lot more power. My coworker has the SF16. Depends a bit on what you need… We’re using it mainly to check the uniformity of conformal coating on PCBs. I can light up an entire board from a meter away, he has to get closer and lights up a smaller spot. For our use, the SF16 is nicer because it still has enough power (we mainly do detail inspection) but USB charging is really useful.
You have not yet indicated whether you prefer more output or longer distance, or whether USB-C charging is important to you. Which one is better is completely up to your preferences.
Any of the lights recommend here has 365nm LEDs and ZWB2 filters, so in terms of light quality they are all pretty much the same. I can’t spot any differences between S2+ UV, SF16 and S12 UV when it comes to the ratio of visible stray light to UV, and how stuff (ID/passport, banknotes, scorpions…) reacts to the lights.