Find a light you want and like (color, tint, UI, etc.), and just slap on some diffusion film. Or just do it to your favorite light.
I got a Xeno E03 (AA/14500) that’s my go-to light around the house. Nice warm-white beam anyway, but with film, it’s a nice almost lantern-like blanket of warm light. Perfect for close-up work, and doesn’t have a sharp abrupt cutoff like an aspheric.
Also got a big Tacklife (26650) that’s a huge solid light that throws like Hell, and with diffusion film in front that’s a perfect around-the-house light as well, but for lighting up whole basements, attics, garages, you name it.
Without adhesive, you’d have to sandwich the film between reflector and glass. With adhesive, you can just slap it on the front. Either way, they’re both removable (disassemble or peel-off).
Actually, on my E03, there’s no adhesive, and it’s still on the front. Somehow managed to cut it the perfect size so that it’s kinda wedged in a crease between glass and bezel, and it just stays put.
a note about 500 floody lumens…
bigger floods use more battery power on target, than tighter hotspots,
because the same total output is spread over a wider area
example
both lights set to the same total lumen level
you can see the tighter beam is brighter on target (within the smaller hotspot)
therefore I think you might find considerably less than 500 lumens on target, sufficient to work in a cabinet, without wasting lumens flooding a wider area than necessary.
a narrower beam will use less battery power to make the target as bright as a wider beam does
this is the opposite of the truism that multi LEDs are more efficient than singles
they are
but
if the beam is floodyer, it is dimmer on target, at the same Total Lumen output
stands to reason that if I spread 100 lumens out over twice the area, it wont be as bright as 100 lumens focused into half the area… right?
Moral of the story Tighter beams are more efficient Wider beams waste more power.
I have one on the way from China (bought from sofirnlight.com). My understanding is that the SP40 just has low, medium and high modes (no moonlight mode) and that it has a hotspot due to using an orange peel reflector rather than a TIR (total internal reflection) optic. But reports say that the hotspot is reasonably large, larger than the Astrolux HL01’s.
Headband is supposed to be good.
The ALL$2OFF coupon might still work on the sofirnlight.com store
Sofirn SP40 ? Because heavy even with short tube , cheap driver no stabilization at all, narrow beam not suitable for short distance work. And if you are on a budget why not just buy D10
So. Bought for testing one of these Pocketman “Magnetic USB Charging Flashlight XHP50 LED Flashlight Rechargeable with Built-in 18650 Battery 12 Lens Waterproof Head Torch” https://www.aliexpress.com/item/4000499758447.html
Maybe, but it’s much too expensive. My own Spark is working fine, the new one is for another guy who does not want to spend so much money for a light he is “using one or two times a year”.
You could try one of these (couldn’t resist checking out the only cheap headlamp that’s amazingly not 3xAAA) but as one of the switches went dead on mine just after a few dozen clicks I can’t recommend it. Beam pattern on the “spot light” is bad. Your co-worker might be happy with it if you give him an 18650 and you get a good one. Can be recharged via USB. Coupons here.
Wow, I have looked for a cheap full flood headlight that has a flood beam just like the zebralight H602w which is 120 degree beam angle with no hotspot for a very long time.
some one reviewed and shot a picture of a beamshot of the light in your link, and it looks to have a full flood beam just like the H602w for only $15! It says it weighs 90 grams, I would hope that is the weight with the battery.