Coronavirus **personal experiences** thread

I will check it out.
I’m really fascinated by human psychological capacity for belief in conspiracies, to the point of fervently seeking out ANY tidbit of content they can find that fits their narrative and “sounds like facts.” We have at least 3 text book cases of such deluded individuals, actively participating in this very topic. They don’t relent, despite numerous proverbial hand slaps. They… are in a mental quagmire.

I admit that made me chuckle.

I appreciate you sense of humor. Irony and “grotesque” are not easily blended, but you did it. Keep going on !

\quote]
… Certain attributes, such as the shape of one’s body, and certain behaviors, such as loud talking or breathing fast, appear to have a major role in spreading the disease.

”They’re not sneezing. They’re not coughing. They’re just breathing and talking,”… “They might be shouting. They might be singing. Karaoke bars have been a big source of superspreading events. We saw one at a spin cycle club up in Hamilton, Ontario, where people are breathing hard.”
[/quote]

https://www.nationalgeographic.com/science/2020/10/why-people-are-coronavirus-superspreaders-how-body-emits-infectious-particles/

I got 4 hours of sleep last night and now I am going to recall a youtube video from 2 to 3 years ago. Let’s see how this goes…

Two or three years ago I was watching a youtube video from a voice actor (Booth Junkie?). And he described doing what seemed like a typical gig. He was hired to read a script in front if a green-screen. It was asking gamers to help another gamer defeat something or something. He did it, got paid, moved on to the next job. Next thing he knows his (Fiver?) account was suspended. It turns out the footage was part of a scam for money from the gamer community, and it worked. He was banned from what was his main source of income.

I bring this up to discuss the production of conspiracy theory videos. You could, in theory, be some random American-hating guy and hire a voice-actor to read your script. Ask him to wear a lab coat. Edit in a hospital background, or whatever, and create a production from clips like this. With the level of production I have seen some of the conspiracy vids posted here, I think there is HUGE profit in a viral conspiracy video. Maybe they could make similar profits to real movies, all while feeding the hate in America.

Yea, I am aware that sounds a lot like a conspiracy theory. Haha. But the important thing is I’m open to discussing the plausibility of it with you guys, not telling you it’s true. What do you guys think?
Sorry if my daughter-induced exhaustion and headache reduced the clarity I was going for in this post.

Joshk,

are you able to give us the name of the scientist (or group of scientists) who managed to isolate the so-called “covid-19”?

YES or NO ?

I believe you nailed it. Time to stop responding to John75. Perhaps he will retreat to his home under the bridge.

To coin a phrase, “it takes two to tango”.

cabfrank, mocking poor people may be a sensitive topic, but instead of “calling for troll and hate speech” why not you answer the question above ?

Excellent remark, let’s remember or discover about the first efficient treatment against variola.

Do you know what was the protocol of vaccination and the exact composition of the “vaccine”?

Let me help you :

he earliest smallpox (variola) prevention efforts date back to at least the 10th century in China, when physicians found that nasal inoculation of susceptible persons with material from smallpox lesions would sometimes provide immunity.

The practice of inoculation appears to have arisen independently in several other regions prior to the 17th century, including Africa and India, but the practice did not gain popularity in western Europe until the 18th century.

The wife of an English ambassador, Lady Montagu, observed inoculation in Turkey, and later had her own child successfully inoculated during a smallpox epidemic in England.

In this procedure a lancet or needle was used to deliver a subcutaneous dose of smallpox material to a susceptible person. The procedure, also known as variolation, was controversial. +It generated immunity in many cases, but it also killed some people and contributed to smallpox outbreaks.
+

A more safe and effective method for smallpox control originated in the late 18th century when Dr. Edward Jenner of Gloucestershire, England noticed that milkmaids exposed to cowpox appeared to be immune to smallpox.

He tested his hypothesis by inoculating a boy with cowpox pus and subsequently challenging him with smallpox. The experiment was a success, and Jenner prepared a paper describing this case along with 13 other individuals who had contracted either horsepox or cowpox before being exposed to smallpox. In one of the worst editorial decisions of all time, the Royal Society rejected the paper and suggested that Jenner cease his cowpox investigations.

Jenner wisely ignored this advice, named the cowpox material the “vaccine virus”, and thus discovered the concept of vaccination.1, 6 Early smallpox vaccinations utilized pustular material from one vaccinated person to directly inoculate another person by scratching the material into the recipient’s arm. Later improvements included the inoculation of cow flanks to obtain larger quantities of virus, and use of glycerol solution as a preservative.

A textbook published in the early 20th century described the vaccination process as follows:

There was no intravenous injection, neither use of hazardous adjuvant added to the treatment.

Ask yourself why after 1950, some scientists decided to add-on highly neurotoxic adjuvants through intravenous “vaccinal” solution.

Ask yourself why autism or Alzheimer’s “syndromes” were quasi inexistent before “modern vaccination campaign”.

SHALL THAT BE THE NEW NORM ?



Well one could point out that autism was actually described during the time of Martin Luther… That smallpox was a thing that became no more due to vacinations…

Oh my. As my great grandma might have said, mention the Devil and you’ll hear the rustle of his wings.
Mention vaccination …… oops. Gish gallop. Sorry I loosened that cork.

In recent news:

PS — when the CDC says “an” they should say “any” infected person.
It’s not limited to the total time around just one infected person.

Thus so much illness among medical people == the exposures add up.

I am writing about vaccines and neurotoxic adjuvants, and you, you bring your great grandma’s evil superstitions in the debate?

Yep, I've learned the hard way that sometimes it's best just to ignore certain people.

You should try harder.

Why did my post disappear, again :person_facepalming:

Here’s is the second part of that one.

An example of how the global medical m@f$a$ - including the WHO - are suppressing everything related to natural treatments >>>

Malaria Business: “Profit comes before public health interests”

Artemisia has been banned! (watch the full video inside)
https://www.garymoller.com/post/artemisia-has-been-banned

and this is the CV treatment… no need to any poisons…

A Novel Approach to Treating COVID-19 Using Nutritional and Oxidative Therapies
https://ozonewithoutborders.ngo/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/Novel-Approach-to-Covid-19.pdf

If a person comes in contact with a common-cold virus but doesn’t get sick, do we say they are sick with a cold? Do we describe that as a “case” of the common cold? Of course we don’t. Cases of the common cold are people who come down with symptoms. If there were a test for that cold virus, the asymptomatic person would probably test ‘positive’ because there is some of the virus in his body, but it’s being fought off successfully by his immune system and he’s not sick.

With that in mind, why are all positive test results for Covid counted as “Covid cases” in nationwide scare statistics, when the vast majority (some say 90%) of those who test ‘positive’ never show any symptoms? Shouldn’t actual Covid “cases” be limited to people who are sick with Covid, just as we have always used the nomenclature with all other illnesses for decades?

The best scientific estimates of the percentage of infected people who are infected but remain asymptomatic range from 20% to 40% - not 90%. And the scientists stress that most people who are asymptomatic at the time of a test will eventually develop at least mild symptoms. Many people with mild Covid-19 symptoms eventually also develop long-term health problems.

One reason why it is necessary to classify infected but asymptomatic people as infected is that asymptomatic individuals can still spread the virus to others. Prevention of the spread of the virus requires infected people to be identified and separated from non-infected individuals. If you don’t know who is infected, you can’t slow the spread of the virus.