I donāt know where or on what forum I read it, but many years ago it was said that a members sig should always contain less lines than their shortest posts. Therefore if someoneās sig contained 7 lines, their posts must contain at least 7 lines of text, but it had to be quality text.
I guess (hope) I would be safe if this was a BLF rule, no lines of sig means my posts donāt have to contain quality text, right?
so, I made my signature point to the comment above about why it doesnāt work any more, hmmm, I wonder if Google or the Internet Archive has a cached copy of that missing post ā¦.
You can do it with a CSS override, same as the site theme I made. However, itās all very manual and canāt be triggered on a āsig too longā condition. Instead, you can hide signatures on a per-user basis or a per-content-type basis. If three peopleās sigs bother you, you can hide only theirs. Or if you want to block all images in signatures, you can do that. Or perhaps all tables in signatures.
TK, I understand the CS for blocking images in signatures (thank you)
What Iād still like to do is block text in signatures (selectively if possible, and blocking multiline/verbose specifically if possible)
I know at some point I just teach myself what to ignore. But if thereās a tool, that frees up a few brain cells otherwise used just to filter my own visual input
EDIT ā tkās code for that works fine, and is posted in the BLF After Dark thread