Budget full-sized handgun <$400, probably 9mm

I'm researching budget full-sized handguns, preferably under $400

I like these three...

Canik TP9SA Mod.2 (the black one) https://www.canikusa.com/tp9sa-mod-2

Sar B6 https://sarusa.com/product/b6-9/

Smith & Wesson SD VE https://www.smith-wesson.com/product/sd-ve

If these come in different versions, I'm looking at the 9mm version.

I don't have to get 9mm, but that's what I'm leaning towards.

I would get hollow-point 9mm ammo for maximum stopping power if the gun takes 9mm ammo.

I like handguns that hold at least 15 bullets.

I would use the handgun only for self-defense.

I might own it for decades and never use it, but I'd like to have one.

Although I don't like the idea of cleaning the handgun every six months even though I might never use it, I will clean it.

Any advice on what to get or where to buy it?

Have you shot any of them before or did you see what reviewed the best? I'd just shoot the ones you (think you) like and you can choose the one you like after. Try some at a range. Nobody can tell really tell you online. If you live in california the maximum magazine size is 10 rounds I believe.

I haven't shot any of these before, but I have shot guns when I was under 18.

I shot different shotguns, a .357 magnum revolver, a .22 handgun, a .45 handgun, and maybe some others.

What I did was Google

best budget handgun

and then followed a bunch of links.

Based on what I read, and my budget, I like these three guns, but I haven't done much research.

I don’t think that the Sar or Canik are on the Calif approved handgun list. You also can’t get magazines greater than 10 rounds in Calif.

You mention that you are planning on using a handgun for self-defense yet might go decades without firing it. To me that’s bad combination in that you have to be extremely comfortable in handling and firing the weapon (any weapon for that matter). That means regular sessions at the range and preferably some self-defense shooting courses.

The S&W doesn’t have a thumb safety so proper gun handling under stress is going to be very important.

Handguns are difficult to use accurately in a high stress situation and unlike the movies or tv hitting something in the dark (a likely scenario for self-defense) is….hard. If you look at some police incident reports you’ll see that there are many misses even when the distances are measured in a few yards.

But to answer your question of the 3 guns you mentioned the S&W is the only option (Calif approved). But you may want to consider getting a revolver instead. A 6 inch barrel 7 round S&W 686 would be a good choice in my opinion. Easier to see if the gun is loaded, not much recoil using .38+ P ammo, and easier to use under stress than a semi-auto.

Most personal encounters are over in less that 5 rounds from most of the stuff I’ve read.

Or get a shotgun instead of a handgun. A Remington Express or Mossberg 500 will run you less than a good handgun and has way more stopping power with something like #4 buck.

Your state has a list of allowable weapons, those not on the list won’t be found for sale. For your safety your state limits you to 10 round capacity. My agency went to 115 Grain FTX - Hornady Critical Defense about 3 years ago. Seems to be a middle of the road round in recoil with good expansion. Guns tend to not need cleaning very often. I’m using these days G96 cleaner it’s a CLP “clean, lube, protect” so light spray on the wipe off with a red coarse shop rag. Mobile one synthetic works well too, a drop on a Q-tip then paint the bearing surfaces. The last two pistols you list are not good pistols. The 1st one is.

Looks like I'll have to do more research and find some handguns that hold ten or less bullets.

Probably the best option. Very flexible with loads available from slugs to birdshot. Ruger PPC 9mm my also be an option, small 9mm carbine that takes Ruger or Glock magazines. Better range and power with less recoil over a handgun.

It’s always a good idea to fire a gun before you buy it. It has to feel comfortable in your hand and also that the grip isn’t too large for your hand (sometimes a problem with double-stack magazines).

By the way I mentioned in a prior post that the S&W doesn’t have a thumb safety. A good thing about that is that there’s nothing to thumb off before you fire it. Under stress that’s an easy thing to forget to do, as I found out shooting a 1911 on a course one-time :person_facepalming:

By the way, I have always been an excellent shot even though I haven't shot guns many times in my life.

I also know how to hold a handgun or shotgun properly so that I don't get injured by recoil.

I do want a full-sized handgun, though, and not a shotgun or other type of gun.

EDIT:

I'll have to do more research some other day because I'm getting tired.

I'll do the research, and then post which California-legal handguns I like.

Ha…ha…ha :rage:

I think I'll figure out which handgun I like the most, see if I can hold it at a local gun shop, and then if I like it, buy it from whoever has the best deal.

Ruger is where I’d start for quality-to-price ratio on the full-size 9mm budget end.

I was looking as some Ruger handguns earlier.

They do seem nice.

It'll probably only take me an hour to come up with some nice handguns that are legal here.

A little over budget at $499 but here 10 round CA compliant Glock 19:

When I was in Boy Scouts, I only did well in two areas.

Computers and shooting a BB gun.

That's because I owned a Commodore 64 and some BB gun.

I played with each quite a bit, and even taught myself how to program with the C64.

Man, I hated camping, though.

Yep, people love their Glocks.

If I wanted to spend that much, I might go with one, but I don't need the nicest gun available--just a somewhat cheap one that works really well.

I have a couple of Rugers. Decent value for the price and always go bang when I pull the trigger (which is obviously very important :stuck_out_tongue: ).

If it’s strictly a self-defense gun, or a range gun, then a Glock 17 would make more sense I think. Might as well be full-size if it’s never going to be carried.

Oh, I plan to jump through the hoops so that I can legally carry the gun with me.

I mean, I'll probably never use it, but I might as well carry it if I can legally.

I want a full-sized handgun because I think the smaller ones make compromises, and I'm not going to go out of my way to conceal the handgun.

Unfortunately that phrase doesn’t hold too much truth with pistols. You get what you pay for. The Glock 17 or 19 is one of those last forever guns that is worth the price.