There's a bunch of boring tedious setup stuff before this - centering the part on the rotary table with the adjustable chuck plate, centering the rotary table under the spindle, setting the tool offset from center (0.055" dia, the table is offset half that (0.028") to the left so the left edge of the tool will be on center), etc.
Since the tripod mount thread is 1/4-20, I figured the hex should be the same as a 1/4-20 nut. Dimensions of 0.433" flat-to-flat, 0.492" point-to-point, & 0.219" thick. To set the depth, the tool is brought down to the top of the plug, and the sample nut placed under the depth stop. Then the total depth of cut will be the same as the thickness of the nut when the depth stop hits bottom.
The table is offset half the point-to-point diameter (0.246") to the left, and a groove is cut all the way around to full depth.
It'll plunge cut fine, but side milling after it's to full depth I only take about 5 thou at a time. It might be fine with more but it's not like there's a boss or efficiency consultant standing behind me with a stopwatch on any of this...
I consider it a safety feature that there's not enough room for a protected cell. It wouldn't work anyway.
I still have to cut two steps on the inside face, like the plug on the left. The first one fits in the ID of the tube, the second is for the o-ring that goes in the tube. There will also be a little pocket for the spring to sit in so it ends up on the same plane as the bottom of the o-ring groove.
Soldering the spring will take a lot of heat and the plug is probably going to change color a bit. If it changes in a nice way I'll leave it, if not I'll bead blast it to a nice no-nonsense satin finish.
(I know there's no such thing as '5C', should be '5C[1,2,3,4]', but that's all the info I have.)
This mix works nice. Very similar to the 92CRI 219B, with just a hint more green. Going by the ANSI chart a 3C or 3D would add a little red in place of the green and would likely be even better. It's close enough you won't ever notice it unless you are comparing it side by side with 219Bs, and that's not bad. Especially considering this will do 3500+ lumens compared to the 219B's ~2000 at similar drive current.