LED test / review - Cree XLamp XP-G4 HI C1 color kit E1 (6500 K, min 70 CRI) - not good looking beam and low luminance

LED test / review EN


Cree XLamp XP-G4 HI C1 color kit E1 (6500 K)


XPGEWT-H1-0000-00000BLE1


2024-07-05


  • Type: flip chip, domeless
  • Bin: C1 (300 lm @ 700 mA 85 °C)
  • Color group: E1 (6500 K)
  • CRI: min 70
  • Rated voltage: typ 2.8 - max 3.3 V
  • Max. Forward current: 3,000 mA
  • Max. Peak current: — mA
  • Viewing angle: 125 ° °
  • Thermal resistance: 1.3 K/W
  • Max. Temperature Tj: max. 150 °C

Datasheet can be downloaded here: Cree XP-G4 HI, 3.2 MB


The emitter tested here was provided to me by BLF user @wolfgirl42. Many thanks for that! This emitter was purchased from Mouser in the USA.

The XP-G4 HI is the domeless version of the previously tested XP-G4, which was tested in 90 CRI variant. The substrate is completely covered by yellow phosphor. This is already known from earlier Cree LEDs (XP-G3, XP-L2) and has caused problematic beams.

The LED chip is built in flip chip technology, which is state of the art. The luminous surface also emits light from the side, which could cause significant tint shift in the beam due to the clearly visible yellowish coloration. The illuminated area is 2.0 mm², although it is almost impossible to determine the exact size due to the lateral radiation and the total illuminated area is way larger.

The 3535 (XP) footprint is exactly the same as for the XP-G4 with dome.






  • at 3,000 mA (official maximum current): 1177 lm @ 3.33 V
  • Power at official maximum: 10.0 W
  • Efficiency at 3,000 mA: 117.7 lm/W
  • Maximum reached at 10.0 A, at this point 2200 lm @ 4.04 V
  • Power at maximum 40.4 W
  • Efficiency at maximum 54.5 lm/W



Data for 25 °C Tsp (at 85 °C the luminance values are around 13 % lower).


The efficiency is relatively high, but so is the Vf. The specified binning is not only met, but even exceeded. The maximum operating current of the XP-G4 HI is primarily limited by the size of the thermal pad; the thermal resistance of the LED chip itself is extremely low. The XP-P has no chance, both Vf and thermal resistance are far too high.

The dimmed Nichia 519A is still the measure of all things in terms of Vf.



The yellow shimmering areas around the illuminated surface creates a not good looking beam in reflectors and TIR lenses. When using reflectors, yellow rings appear around a bluish-white spot, which is also in general often referred to as “Cree Rainbow” and has been occurring for years with the older XP-G3 and XHP70.2.

It may be possible to reduce this effect by adapting the optics accordingly, similar to the XHP70.2.



The spectrum corresponds to that of a cool white LED with a low color rendering index. There are no surprises. The Cree specification of “min. 70 CRI” is adhered to. The tint is slightly greenish, although, as is typical for Cree, the tint changes little or not at all with increasing operating current.


  • Ra: 70
  • R9: -31
  • CCT: 6343 K
  • duv: 0.0047

To summarize: The XP-G4 HI is an XP-G4 without dome, with all its problems. The beam is as expected, and the LED is less suitable for applications with optics if a good beam is essential. The luminance is significantly lower than that of LEDs of a similar size (CSLPM1.TG, XP-P) due to the lateral shimmering light surfaces. This LED is therefore hardly suitable for flashlights.


Thank you for reading this test. :slight_smile:

Greetings, Dominik


v1.0.2
11 Thanks

:face_with_peeking_eye:
This ain’t pretty.

Yeah, don’t know what Cree is planning with this LED. The beam is bad, the luminance is low and the tint is only standard for those cool-white LEDs. Better go with SFT-12, maybe XP-L HI 2nd gen, SFT-40 (if possible because of 5050 footprint), dedomed 519A or CSLPM1./NM1.TG, which are also relatively cheap and much better performing.

Only thing I could imagine is industrial lighting in a panel with 10+ LEDs behind TIRs. That should cancel out the tint-shift, and the LED is very power efficient, at least. But in such an application I’d rather expect a domed emitter. And companies mostly understood workers work better if you do not make them suffer from 70 CRI crap LEDs^^

Really I cannot imagine any use-case for these emitters. Okay, they are also available in TLCI 95 or high CRI (at least on paper, but we all know that we will never get the really interesting ones because they are never really available at wholesalers), but apart from this I don’t get it. Even with special TIR the Cree rainbow would be visible, more or less.

And yes, for industrial lighting (where efficiency is king) it makes no sense to use domeless LEDs like these with horrible beam characteristics. Also really funny to read about the use-cases of the XP-G4 in the official datasheet :smiley: (indoor premium, portable, architectural)

2 Thanks

Real shame about the tint shift, very nice output for 3535 otherwise… Well, if anyone wants to buy a few for… reasons, I have some spare.

Sorry I’ve ignored this for so long, been really busy with some stuff.