LED test / review - Skilhunt SL-F35R-3V (5000 K 95 CRI) - good high CRI LED with small LES and high luminance

LED test / review EN


Skilhunt SL-F35R-3V (5000 K 95 CRI)


2026-02-04


  • Type: single die, lateral
  • Bin: —
  • Color group: — (5000 K)
  • CRI: 95
  • Rated voltage: 3 V
  • Max. Forward current: 3000 mA
  • Max. Peak current: 6000 mA
  • Viewing angle: — °
  • Thermal resistance: — K/W
  • Max. Temperature Tj: max. —°C

I received the F35R from Skilhunt in mid-January 2026. I do not have any further information about these LEDs apart from the values stated above.

The F35R has a simple design. The light surface is covered by orange phosphor and is surrounded by white silicone potting compound. Bonding wires are not directly visible, but can be seen beneath the potting compound when reflected appropriately. Four bonding wires appear to be used. All in all, the F35R is very reminiscent of a smaller version of the FFL505A or W5050SQ3, which have already been tested.

The footprint is compatible with all 3535 and XP boards, and the thermal pad is electrically insulated.

This LED may be from HSXLED (Hopthink), but this cannot be confirmed.

The luminous surface is covered with bright orange phosphor, which indicates a larger amount of red phosphor with a high wavelength maximum.

The luminous surface measures 2.69 mm2. There is virtually no light emitted to the sides.






  • at 6000 mA (official maximum current): 1155 lm @ 3.63 V
  • Power at official maximum: 21.8 W
  • Efficiency at 6000 mA: 53.0 lm/W
  • Maximum reached at 8.6 A, at this point 1286 lm @ 3.93 V
  • Power at maximum 33.8 W
  • Efficiency at maximum 38.1 lm/W




Data for 25 °C Tsp (at 85 °C the luminance values are around 13 % lower).


The F35R is relatively efficient, at least when compared to similar LEDs with similar color rendering and LES size. The Vf is quite high at maximum possible current, which should enable direct drive operation, at least with smaller batteries (14500 and similar).

The luminance is relatively high compared to other 3535 emitters with high CRI. However, due to the lower efficiency and the associated low luminous flux, the luminance does not match that of common 3535 emitters with a small light-emitting area. In general, LEDs with a small light-emitting area and low CRI are more suitable for throwers, with the disadvantage of visibly poorer light quality.

The beam is flawless, with no artifacts. Depending on the reflector used and its quality, slight rings may appear.



The spectrum shows no abnormalities. The specified CRI (Ra 95 / R9 80) is maintained. In general, the spectrum is very similar to other neutral white high CRI LEDs from recent production. The cyan hole is normal, and the R12 is lower, as expected with blue-pumped LEDs.

In addition to YGG:Ce3+ with λex=513 nm and YAG:Ce3+, Ca-a-SiAlON:Eu2+ is also very likely to be used. SSN:Eu2+ with a λex=620-630 nm is probably used for the red component. YGG:Ce3+ seems to be relatively popular for such high CRI LEDs because it is quite temperature-stable and, above all, can fill the cyan hole to a certain extent.

There is no strong tint shift with increasing current. The tint is solid and offers no cause for complaint.


  • Ra: 95
  • R9: 91
  • CCT: 5348 K
  • duv: -0.0007

The SL-F35R-3V is essentially a solid LED that does little wrong. The tint is good, the beam is just perfect, and the performance is relatively high.

The biggest disadvantage is the lack of a source of supply from Skilhunt, which makes it difficult or impossible to use in DIY projects. This means that this LED is only worth recommending in theory. There is also no official data sheet, so characteristic curves and other important parameters remain unclear.


Thank you for reading this test. :slight_smile:

Greetings, Dominik


v1.0.2
21 Thanks

Looks pretty good, though the high-CRI SFT25R has a bit smaller LES and a bit higher efficiency. I expect these to be a big hit in Skilhunt’s lights; I’ve always wanted a bit more reach from the M150 and M200 with 519As.

But is also likely more expensive and has more chance of being green. I think Skilhunt is aware of this greenish tint problem and will order LEDs on or below BBL.

But yes, I also think these LEDs would be quite popular in Skilhunt lights since they do basically everything right, except for slightly lower efficacy.

Someone should tell Skilhunt about green AR glass. Most of their lenses raise Duv, but I’m glad they’re paying attention to it when it comes to LEDs.

2 Thanks

I don’t really get the point of this, since it’s round isn’t it the main point to throw very far ?

But it’s not going to throw very far it only produces 500 lumens at 1 amp

The Cree xhp series is way better in terms of power

I wish it produced like 4,000 lumens at 6 amps or 8 amps while still retaining 90 plus CRI

Excellent, informative review as always!

I’m not so impressed by this emitter’s output compared to FFL350RD. Barely any higher despite a 5000K vs 3500K CCT advantage, plus the FFL’s substantial efficiency loss from masking a square die to achieve roundness.

A bit off topic, but do you happen to have a list of papers/datasheets on these phosphors? If so, I would be really grateful if you could send me via direct message; if not, I’m happy to look them up myself.

Smaller (real round) LES of the F35R makes a huge difference. The FFL350RD was basically a fake round (square) LES which was way bigger. Pretty sure the 350RD was held back in it’s performance by this shady method of creating a “round LES”.

I have a list; but it took me probably weeks to create it… I will think about it. Let’s talk about this via PM.

1 Thank

The point of something like this is to increase throw in a given flashlight model without giving up other useful traits like nice tint and good color rendering. This will throw farther than a Nichia 519A in any of the several lights Skilhunt makes with that emitter.

Looking at the LED flashlights with the most throw for their size, it’s rare to see the Cree XHP series and common to see LEDs with a small surface area. It’s just as useful to decrease area as to increase output when the goal is more throw.

Skilhunt’s other bespoke LED, the F50S produces higher output, but it has a considerably larger area and will produce less throw in the same size optic even if driven very hard.

And more specifically, the FFL350RD, which looks just about identical to me from your tests and pictures, including down to the translucent substrate and the ~8A output peak:

I assume the 10% or so lower efficiency on the Fireflies emitter is due to the warmer CCT. Too bad Fireflies doesn’t also offer it in 5000K like the Skilhunt.

@koef3 can you please compare emitter height vs other emitters?
I had a few FFL350RD 6500k 95CRI by Jackson Lee and they were great but emitter being a bit tall i had problem focusing reflectors and TIRs
I wonder if it is corrected in this type

2 Thanks

4000lm at 6A would be ~185lm/W which would be an incredible achievement from any emitter with Ra >90. Most low CRI emitters don’t even come close to that efficacy.

3 Thanks

High praise indeed. I have FFL505A 3500k in E04 Surge. For me, all things considered this is the number 1 light in my collection of tint snobs and walk lights.

I like Skilhunt, despite of the weird new name (who came up with this, does it mean anything other than being a strange tongue twister - kidding :slightly_smiling_face:), and very curious to see what they are going to do with this LED. For example replacing 519a in EC150?

I had already asked Skilhunt which lights the new F35R would ultimately be equipped with, but they have not yet provided any specific information (“all compatible lights are potential candidates”).

I will look in the next days

3 Thanks

Looks very promising. Only about 14% lower than sft25r but maitain a remarkable CRI and DUV.
But i guess skilhunt won’t put this for open sale.

Is this not essentially the HT35 on Kaidomain right now? I bought some of these (and modded some in lights recently) and they pretty much seem like that. Despite being advertised as 4000k, they are definitely in the 5000k-ish range, high CRI, and negative DUV.

The HT35 are different than the FFL350RD for sure and definitely aren’t those at least, where the FFL350RD measured more around 3500k-3700k.

just checked HT35, at least the LES is similiar.
It could be in the same batch but not meet skilhunt requirement. so the emitters are declined by skilhunt.

There is no proof for that. Since I don’t have samples of these HT35 LEDs I cannot make a comparison. Maybe these are from the same manufacturer, maybe not…

Agreed. That is all my guess.
I ordered some HT35 emitter from 1688. if they are indeed HT35…I will tried to make some measurement.

At 3A looks like it is 21% less looking at the chart compared to the SFT25R 5700K 90CRI, aprox 860lm vs aprox 680lm, at 6A seems to be around 17% output.
What do you think @koef3?