LED test / short review - LMP LHP73B (5000 K 70 CRI)

LED short test / short review EN


LMP LHP73B (5000 K 70 CRI)


LHP73B-B0-3B-J4-VU


2025-07-24


  • Type: multi die, flip chip
  • Bin: J4 (min 1120 lm / max 1200 lm)
  • Color group: 3B (5000K)
  • CRI: 70

The LHP73B tested here was purchased from Convoylight in July 2025. Many thanks to Reddit user u/Perfect_Jaguar2123 for their support!

Lumenpioneer (LMP for short) previously introduced the LML2AW.DC, a type of SST-40 clone. The LHP73B shown here corresponds to the design of an XHP70.3 HI. According to Convoylight’s description, Sanan chips are used.

The LHP73B has a simple design. Sixteen small LED chips are arranged in a square of 4x4 on a dark gray substrate and connected using the flip chip process. They are surrounded by white potting compound. The LED chips protrude slightly from the white potting compound.

With dimensions of 7.00 x 7.00 mm and the familiar 7070 footprint, these LEDs can be used freely on 7070 boards. Since the 3 V version was tested here, the permissible LED forward voltage must be observed when replacing the LED!

Changing the forward voltage to 6 V is possible with a modified footprint (connection) of the LED board. However, these boards are less commonly available, especially with DTP.

There is virtually no light emitted from the sides of the chips, except for a small yellow frame around the array of chips. The light-emitting area is 25 mm² in size.






  • Maximum reached at 30 A, at this point 8869 lm @ 3.29 V
  • Power at maximum 98.8 W
  • Efficacy at maximum 89.8 lm/W




Data for 25 °C Tsp (at 85 °C the luminance values are around 13 % lower).


The LHP73B definitely does not break any performance records here, at least when considering pure luminous flux alone. The maximum possible operating current of 30 A (equivalent to approximately 15 A at 6 V) is lower than that of the XHP70.3 HI.

What is remarkable, however, is the extremely low forward voltage of 3.29 V, which results from the parallel connection of all 16 chips. Since the current is divided among all 16 chips, the 3.29 V applies to a current per LED chip of approximately 1.9 A (554 lm per chip). This is a good value for LED chips of this size, even though the luminous flux per LED chip is low. Performance may be limited by relatively high thermal resistance.

Efficacy is very high. At around 90 lm/W at maximum possible current, it achieves a significantly higher luminous flux than the XHP70.3 HI at the same power. It should be noted that the light-emitting area of the LHP73B is significantly larger than that of the XHP70.3 HI, which reduces the possible throw with the same reflector size.

The other LEDs shown for reference don’t stand a chance. The SFT-70 has significantly lower performance due to its design and smaller footprint; while the FFL707A is less efficient anyway due to its high color rendering index.

The luminance is similar to that of the XHP70.3 HI. Thanks to the almost complete absence of lateral light emission next to the LES, the luminance of the LHP73B is several percentage points higher despite its larger light-emitting area.



The spectrum offers no surprises. Standard YAG:Ce3+ phosphor is used in combination with (presumably) Ca-a-SiAlON:Eu2+ to achieve the lower CCT. There is a very pronounced cyan hole.

The color rendering index is very low at 69 and an Ra of -42. The color temperature is higher than specified.


  • Ra: 69
  • R9: -42
  • CCT: 5519 K
  • duv: 0.0021

The LHP73B is essentially a logical further development of existing multi-die 7070 LEDs. With 16 chips and high efficacy, it is an alternative to the XHP70.3 HI.

The biggest advantage of this LED is its price. At less than $1.80 per unit, it significantly undercuts the price of all multi-die LEDs in the 7070 footprint. Combined with its useful tint and clean beam, it is well suited for lamps where a floody all-round beam is more important, and it is also suitable as an extremely affordable sidegrade of existing 7070 LEDs.


Thank you for reading this test. :slight_smile:

Greetings, Dominik


v1.0.2
23 Thanks

And that it’s 3V. Not many LEDs in that power-range are 3V.

Thanks for the test!

What would you say is the current-sweetspot for this LED?

1 Thank

I would not exceed 20-22 Amps of current.

2 Thanks

That would be around 7000 Lumens at ~63W, so over 100lm/w.
Nice to see, especially for that price.
Can’t get my head around that those LEDs are so cheap… What would the flashlight world look like without Simon.

2 Thanks

Material costs (LED chips!), low wages, high quantities, minimal QA or high manufacturing tolerances, wide bins (which in turn saves working time and machinery), modular system of LED chips and substrates, and Simon is likely to sell the chips at close to the purchase price.

3 Thanks

Which also means double the current which is really hard for the wires.

It is if you prioritize pure brightness. Because of large LES it’s also very floody and high CRI options are not available.

Thank you for the review.
At what current was the CCT 5519K read?

1 Thank

around 350 mA

1 Thank

Thanks for the test. I wonder if Nightwatch has the same variants if the LMP LEDs? Overall they’re pretty good as to be expected at the price point for sure. However, unless price is a big factor, and you absolutely need 3 volts, I don’t see a super compelling reason to get one of these over a xhp70.3 HI.

The huge current requirements at higher outputs basically negate any high sustsinable output so these will essentially be run around 5-10 amps most of the time and because of the good efficacy they’d really shine in multi led arrays like 3, 4 or 5 led setup in parallel. I’d like to see that.

Anyone know if the 4000k version will be high cri? At least 90?

There’s no word about high CRI variants of the LHP73B so it’s safe to assume it’s going to be low CRI.

1 Thank

That sucks. Now I’m less excited

I might have missed it, but what angle are the colorimetry results taken? This is a very important parameter to know, due to angular tint shift.

I find it easier to think of it as a replacement for XHP70.2, since LHP73B dominates it in all the familiar metrics: output/efficacy, tint, throw per input power. Even though the 73B attains a peak intensity greater than 70.3HI, it is very likely that the 70.3HI will have the advantage at the same drive power, due to the smaller LES.

I measured the mixed light from the LED in my sphere, no direct measurement since my spectrometer cannot measure brighter light sources.

1 Thank

With a CCT of 5519K at ~350mA, how cold does is get at 20A, 6000K?

I cannot test this due to limitations in my equipment, the same reason as I wrote before.

From personal experience the tintshift is not really visible. Subjectively it is more or less on the same level as for the XHP70.3 HI.

LHP73B 5000K@ 5000K in a M21B

Equals to 0.0037 duv, which is quite high, given the description “non greenish”. How would you describe the tint?

I would say it’s a quite pure 5000K, not green, not yellow, not purple.
Since it’s going through a AR Lens, that might change it a bit.

With no lens, but not in pure darkness (I can’t move, my cat is on my lap. Priorities)


DUV = 0.0005

2 Thanks

As long as they’re not like Luminus offerings where the 5000K end up >6000K at high current. I

I’ll still wait for Simon to get the 4000K before I order some.

2 Thanks