do not worry, all will be fine. I use 660nm (for growing lighting) since 2014, and I see difference by my eyes between 630 and 660nm without spectrometer.
Also I am going to order it from another seller too
I asked Barry from sofirn about making an LT1 “Host” (everything except for LEDs and mcpcb) available but sofirn seems to not accommodate such changes unless they can expect 50-100 orders.
Because of the risk of spam messages and calls, it is generally not a good idea to share personal contact information on the web. I recommend editing the post to remove the number and sharing such information by private message.
Barry was the Sofirn contact for various BLF-Sofirn joint projects, like the Q8 and the LT1 lantern, although he is not the boss, he has influence, and for us the only one there who speaks english.
I understand that 660nm is available but I can’t resist to mention an experiment I did a few years ago.
The experiment was adding red light to 80CRI 2700K leds, and it appeared that the most effective wavelength for that was 640nm, which is more efficient than 660nm (almost 3 times as visible to the eye) and makes for a better spectrum with less of a gap in the red region. The CCT went down to about 2400K if I remember well, and CRI went up to 95.
I’m not sure if I like the sunlike + red idea…
SOL has no problem with producing 660nm and even over 700nm.
I have a feeling that colour rendering is more likely to go down than up, especially if there’s a lot of red mixed in to the spectrum.
But I’m not sure about it.
Anyway, mixing different red wavelengths might be an option as well.