Reading thru some reviews I have a suggestion.
Add in the Summary section:
DATE ORDERED in this format: 2010-08 (Exact day is not important)
DATE REVIEWED (So many times on the net you will run across a review and it's not dated. You order the product and the product you get is totally different than the review)
*Date reviewed /date ordered...Might roll this into (1) if dates are close... the point is to tie review to product produced within a certain time frame. Using cars as a example the 1st year a car rolls off the line is likely to be problematic, the LAST year they produce that model will have all the bugs worked out.
I remember the PORSCHE 914 when it first came out, they said it handled poorly/ a deathtrap... The problem? The stickers inside the door jam which state tire pressure settings were wrong. (Talk about a easy fix!- add air and it's a totally different animal!)
MARKINGS on PACKAGING / Unit that might give clues to factory that produced the item, / year/month it was produced.
The purpose of the addtional info is so the review matches shipping product. Vendors will change suppliers, substituting different parts over the course of a run. A 2009 model may be a totally different animal than a 2010 model.
Another suggestion: Maybe add review date to thread title so threads may be sorted by review date? Again for the reason a 2009 model may be totally different than a 2010, 2011, 2012 model,,,,
2010-08_-_DX Powerlight HX-G011 1W 1xAA (DX sku 2089)
or
DX Powerlight HX-G011 1W 1xAA (DX sku 2089)_-_2010-08
(Second naming convention might be better to keep reviews of the same product together)
DX Powerlight HX-G011 1W 1xAA (DX sku 2089)_-_2010-08
DX Powerlight HX-G011 1W 1xAA (DX sku 2089)_-_2011-09
PS: Another thing to add to the Summary section that people might apperciate but would be hard to do would be date ordered /date recevied... That said maybe it might be better to just give generic delivery time frame for that vendor.