I don't think high CRI is the solution to avoiding any "rainbow" effect". The difference between hotspot/spill is still there.
When that is said, I think that several of the "3" tints are the worst when it comes to the effect. Because they give you a NW hotspot, but typically CW spill. This is just my personal opinion. I think the effect is clearly visible on all the typical emitters no matter CRI or tint. But for some reason I find it less disturbing when looking at most 4-8 tints.
Factors I believe helps getting rid of the "rainbow effect" as I like to name it (differenct colors between hotspot and spill).
-Pure flood, at similar intensity, the color seem to be similar.
-A beam with more smooth transition between flood/spill. Gradual change can be better than a sudden one.
-Several emitters, this seems to help a lot, even if they are all the same.
MT-G2 seem to have a more whiter beam (check Easywhite and Macadam). MT-G2 also have the beam style with the traits that helps XM-L2s getting rid of a colorful beam too (floody, and and sometimes a bit gradual transition between hotspot/corona/spill. On top of the beamshape, MT-G2 uses EasyWhite technology.
What is EasyWhite?
"The EasyWhite technology relies on mixing emitters with slightly different CCTs to consistently achieve narrower binning than LED manufacturers can deliver with individual emitters"
This is exaclty what Im doing with mixing various emitters with slightly different tints.
See the BBL (Black Body Lucus curve) in the picture above, Easywhite is closer to this. This is my goal with emitter mixing as well. This effect is already "built into the MT-G2" since it uses easy white technology, but by combining various different XM-L2s (or XP-G2s) on different sides of the BBL you kinda get the same effect it seems.
The advantage is also what I have said several times in this thread, you also get the possibilities to shape the beam more as you like depending on what tint or the amount of throw you like.