【TS10V3 prototype】Should we continue with the TS10 series~

If I understand correctly, I think they were asking about modifying the TS15 driver to allow Anduril to run on it. It probably means changing the MCU to attiny1616 or avr32dd20, moving the circuit traces to fit a new pin map, adding firmware flashing pads on the spring side of the driver, and having me build a compatible version of the firmware.

I can help with firmware, and I can advise on rough concepts for how the driver circuit works, but I don’t have the skills to actually implement a driver circuit. For that, you would need someone like thefreeman or loneoceans, who are both experts in this type of circuit design.

… and the circuit design is the hard part.

Or Wurkkos could modify an existing design like the TS15 or the SP10 Pro, which could probably be done internally by Wurkkos’s engineers. But if you do this, please allow an Anduril firmware engineer (or one of BLF’s circuit engineers) to communicate directly with Wurkkos’s circuit engineer, without anyone in the middle. Things usually go much faster and produce a better result when the engineers can talk to each other.

8 Thanks

Btw, Wurkkos claims the TS15 has a buck driver, but it is not true. See this note from PiercingTheDarkness review:


It’s probably boost for AA and linear or FET for 14500 battery.

1 Thank

@Wurkkos Check also this discussion we had on Reddit about TS10v3 possible features: Wurkkos asking for TS10 V3 input - what changes/features should they add? : r/Anduril_Flashlight.

Here is a copy of my thoughts from that thread:

Wurkkos should probably look hard at the Noctigon KR1AA as the most direct “what else can I buy instead?” competitor and decide what TS10 V3 offers vs that light.

KR1AA is roughly $49, so I’m guessing Wurkkos’ main advantage will be price (like a half of that). But feature-wise KR1AA is a tough benchmark: AA + 14500 support, great boost driver (TheFreeman 18W), magnetic tailcap, and excellent emitter choices.

One concrete way TS10 V3 could differentiate: offer a really good ~3500K option (high CRI, rosy, well-binned). Hank’s KR1AA options jump from 2700K and 3000K to a 4200K (that measures more like 4400K), and there’s basically no true 3500K choice - that’s a gap Wurkkos could fill. If Wurkkos nails 3500K + good DUV, that alone could be a strong reason to pick V3.

I think including a USB-C 14500 battery as the default is a nice (compact and cheap) solution for recharging on the go, and it could cover some of the reasons why people want AA compatibility.

2 Thanks

Dedomed 5000K 519a would be about 3800K:

I think the path of least resistance for Wurkkos would be to use the SC13 buck driver with 519a 5000K LED, in a TS10SG with USB 14500 battery.

Im also a big fan of the TS10SG with a High CRI SFT25 5700K:

before and after:

The TS10SG w SFT25 is nice and Throwy..

With a Buck driver and High CRI SFT25 5700K LED, a new TS10SG would appeal to all the people that wanted the KR1AA to have more throw than the D3AA…

I think a TS10SG could also be very popular in Titanium with a Copper Head :wink:

This could be pretty interesting. I think something like a Zebralight SC65C beam but AA and with Anduril. I think an efficient boost driven AA light that doesn’t even support 14500 could be unique in the market.

The KR1AA with NTG50 can sustain ~250 lumens for almost an hour. Give me an AA only TS10v3 with 3000k SFT40. It would probably sustain ~200 lumens. Essentially a Zebralight SC54 but with a better emitter and Anduril. I would buy that.

Agree

1 Thank

A 219b or 519a is a direct swap onto the existing TS10SG mcpcb, would that suit you?

Or do you prefer a TS10 triple? (requires a new mcpcb):

It is simpler for Wurkkos to put a 219b or 519a into a TS10SG than into a TS10 Triple. Because the TS10SG mcpcb is already compatible. The TS10 triple would need a redesigned mcpcb, similar to the one by Zwerglein02.

But a 219b or 519a in a TS10SG wont have as much throw as an SFT25.

I think a Throwy TS10SG with High CRI SFT25 5700K and Buck Driver would be one of the most unique small 14500 products in the market. It would be in a niche by itself. And I dont think it needs to be AA compatible. Especially if it comes with the USB-C 14500.

It would not have to compete in the lumen wars with Floody lights that have Low Candela per Lumen, such as the dual fuel D3AA and KR1AA.

3 Thanks

519A LEDs are quite expensive. A big part of their appeal to enthusiasts is that they can be dedomed, which gives them a rosier (more pleasant) tint.

It might be worth mentioning to your colleagues at Wurkkos that the current trend seems to be manufacturers like Skilhunt, Firefly, and Emisar ordering custom LEDs (high CRI and negative DUV) from Hopthink/HSXLED, a Chinese manufacturer. They’re even slightly better than dedomed 519As in terms of color rendering, tint, and output, while also being cheaper.

3 Thanks

I vote for this combination.
But I think that AA compatibility could be a good selling point for non flashaholics.

5 Thanks

true, but then the light would also be better for non flashoholics without Anduril.. For example the way Wurkkos offers the HD12, which is dual fuel, dual channel, no Anduril. (after HD10 was discontinued)

otoh, If the new TS10 is going to continue to use Anduril, I think the USB-C 14500 that Wurkkos included in the TS10SG helps make up for lack of AA.

Another niche that Wurkkos could appeal to is the Fancy Metal buyer.. The way Sofirn did when they made the Copper SC13 with Anduril, Buck driver, and USB charging. Sofirn also targetted the fancy metal buyer with their new Copper Cube… it seems Sofirn believes that Copper appeals to a certain market segment..

2 Thanks

While “rosy” is popular it is not universally liked, some of us want neutral tint. The advantage of the 519 is that it can be supplied with dome and if you want to de-dome it you can.

“Better” does not equal “pinker” for everyone.

6 Thanks

agree..

here is an LED Poll for a TS10SG

2 Thanks

Yes, I oversimplified it. With Hopthink-HSXLED, they can specify exactly how neutral or rosy they want the LED to be. For example, the new custom Skilhunt emitters are very neutral, with a DUV right at zero.

The main point is that these custom Chinese LEDs are significantly cheaper than Japanese Nichias, and Wurkkos needs to keep the TS10V3’s price down if they want it to be a successful successor.

5 Thanks

This thread is about what Wurkkos could do to get people to buy the TS10 v3, not about how I could mod a discontinued model. The goal isn’t for me to have a nicer TS10… but for everyone to have a nicer TS10.

3 Thanks

agree

Do you think a TS10 with a Single LED could be attractive to buyers, or do you think it is important for it to be a Triple?

A Single LED TS10 would be easier for Wurkkos to build, they would not need to design a new mcpcb.

Do you think Dual Fuel is a priority to attract buyers, or could a Buck driver be attractive enough?

A Buck driver would be simpler for Wurkkos, they would not need to design a new driver.

I know you weren’t asking me, but I have an opinion.

For the type of light that the TS10 is, I think (obviously just my personal thoughts) the triple is a better option. My use for these tiny lights is entirely close range. The triple is better for this as it is easier to get good flood in the space allowed for the optics. The triple can be more efficient for close range work and that is important with the small cells that they use. It is also easier to get relatively high output from a triple.

Just as an example, I recently got an FWAA and an FW1AA from new stock. I find the FWAA much more useful and it is the one that I carry.

I know that some folks are fixated on throw, but it almost becomes moot for a light this size. The differences between a single and a triple is not enough for me to give up the other advantages of a triple.

Anyway, I hope that the new version, at least, is offered in both configurations. But if I had to pick just one, it would be the triple.

7 Thanks

glad to hear your opinion that you prefer your FWAA Triple over your FW1AA Single, that says a lot

thanks for adding to the discussion :wink:

The FWAA doesnt even have Aux, nor dual fuel, nor flashing pads, and it costs more than the TS10 Triple.. But the FWAA has Domed 519a 4000K LEDs..

Maybe Wurkkos should prioritize building a TS10 triple with Domed 519a 4000K LEDs, like the FWAA.

2 Thanks

This seems more like an upgrade of TS10SG, using a single high CRI 519A LED chip for better color temperature, or a LED with a long-range such SFT25R. If it’s just a simple upgrade to constant current, it’s currently achievable,but is it necessary to have an AUX light

Don’t forget FWAA also has 2500 lm turbo - which no other mass-market 14500 could match, or even comes close. It’s a most impressively bright and beautiful warm Nichia beam to my eyes. Albeit for less than 30 seconds :innocent:.

If you don’t need Turbo, it will comfortably handle 300 lm as expected of this light size. I see its typical use: 300 lm most of the time, then temp turbo for when you need to SEE.

1 Thank

Exactly. Small lights for my use is close-up, around the house. I much prefer a floody, wide, even beam than a throwy beam with small hotspot.

Title of thread is TS10V3 (triplet) prototype anyway. Not single LED TS10SG. Perhaps question posed this way due to the popularity of TS10 v1 and v2, and that’s the model that Wurkkos wants to continue?

4 Thanks