Over the years, I have played around with using some type of ring/collar surrounding a led, to direct light back onto the die in hopes of improving the beam, or creating a tighter beam. Since I'm mostly a hack and since science and mathematics are only strange sounding and meaningless words to me, I think people who can do those things beat me to it. (Wavien).
But, I still play around with the stuff once in a while and I wanted to play with an MT-G2. My goal was to make a "thrower" out of it, with something that was very cheap and readily available.
I didn't really succeed, but what I did come up with was a beam profile for the MT-G2 that I like very much and may even use it in a light or two.
So, I will show you what I did and you can see the crazy old fart come up short once again...
Please excuse the mess. I made a makeshift 1 meter testbed for measuring lux output, so I could get some kind of comparison data.
This is one of the 5000k MT-G2 leds from Cutter and I put in on an aluminum heat sink. I soldered thin copper tabs onto the contacts, so I could get low to the die face with the reflector. The Kapton tape was for insulating the contacts from the reflector. I used a 52mm reflector from CNQG. I have used many of them in Maglites and I opened this one up to fit a ring on the bottom. A ring that would face toward the die, like a small reverse reflector.
I will explain what the ring is made of later.
I am using two efest IMR 14500s for power and just some jumper wires to connect.
So I started out with the bare reflector sitting right down as low as it could go, just to have some kind of base measurement.
It's a fairly large and ugly spot and what you can't see very well are the "Dots" that seem to be inherent in an MT-G2 leds profile.
So I just started raising the reflector, using plastic spacers. I found about the best mix was when the bottom of the reflector was flush with the top of the die face.
It's still not pretty, but it did give out the highest lux readings of all the tests. I can still see the "Dots" in the beam and I don't care for the spill much, but it is the brightest spot.
Then I went ahead and put the ring in place.
Well, that's much more pleasing to me. The spot is smooth and I'm hardly seeing any "Dots" in it. The spill is just the way I like it.
A zoom out shows more of the whole beam and the large, smooth spill from it. I really prefer this to tighter spots, but it's all just a matter of preference.
Ok, what is the collar made of?
You should know by now...
It's a cut down Maglite AA Incandescent Reflector.
What did I get for lux readings?
These are the 1 meter numbers:
Original with the reflector itself, all the way down as far as it would seat - 6050 lux, according to the meter it read 605 and that's at the X10 lux setting, so it should read 6050 lux
Reflector raised till the bottom of it was flush with the top of the die face - 8000 lux, according to the meter it read 800 and that's at the X10 lux setting, so it should read 8000 lux
The reflector with the "O-L Ring" installed - 6750 lux, according to the meter it read 675 and that's at the X10 lux setting, so it should read 6750 lux
So, it wasn't a success as far as getting a much higher lux reading with this collar, since a focused reflector seemed to get a much higher number, but the overall improvement in the beam profile was really pleasing. I think I may try some more tests with it and maybe put it into a light.