Also, while the initial GT FC40 was 12V only, this can be made to work in 6/12V, giving it more freedom.
Still not the 3/6V it would have ideally been, but it’s still an upgrade over the previous one, and it has a much smaller LES to boot, which means it’s a lot throwier than the GT FC40.
Funny thing is that the specified LES is smaller than the B35AM, and since it has a DTP, perhaps it’ll be able to replace the B35AM in Convoy lights for example.
Ok, I also discovered something else: the emitters used in the GT-FC20 and GT-FC40 are the same, while the GT-FC30 and GT-FC60 use the same emitters as well, and they’re more efficient to boot.
It might actually explain why the GT FC40 wasn’t that efficient, even for a high CRI emitter: same LES as the higher power higher end FC60, but different lower class emitters.
Cree datasheet does not state r9, so we will need to wait for some independent test. Maybe they are R9080. There’s also a 95CRI 5700K,but still not available anywhere.
So, question: would anyone be ok if I ordered an FC60 to test out the efficiency difference vs the FC40? I have an FC40 M21B on the way, so I think testing the efficiency difference vs the FC40 would be great.
The difference between the FC40 and FC60 are the same between the FC20 and FC30: better higher quality more efficient emitters that can handle more current as well.
@tactical_grizzly, thanks. I’m not sure if I could currently get the FC60 by myself, since I’m already at my limit for the currently allocated budget for the sample order currently(the future GB order will different, but the future is different than today), especially since I might want to add some FC-15s as well if it is indeed 3V 5050.
Unless you want to pitch in, I’m not sure if I can make some room for 1 extra or 2 FC60s.