LED test / review - Luminus SFT-42R-WES (6500 K 70 CRI)

LED short test / short review EN


Luminus SFT-42R-WES (6500 K 70 CRI)


2025-11-29


  • Type: single die, lateral
  • Bin: G1
  • Color group: BA-BB (6500 K)
  • Voltage: 2.5-3.1 V @ 1,500 mA
  • CRI: typ. 70

The SFT-42R tested here was purchased from Convoylight in mid-September. A data sheet can be found here.

In general the SFT-42R is similar to the SFT-25R. The biggest difference is the larger light-emitting area and the associated larger footprint. The metal frame on the substrate, familiar from many earlier Luminus emitters, has been replaced by a frame made of solid silicone, presumably to reduce manufacturing costs.

The chip is connected with 8 bonding wires. There is no clear silicone layer on the LED chip.

The LED measures 5.00 x 5.00 mm. Thanks to the familiar 5050 footprint, the SFT-42R is compatible with all standard 5050 boards.

The luminous area is approximately 5 mm2. Despite the 4.3 mm2 specified in the data sheet, the luminous area appears larger because the phosphor has been applied to a larger area than the LED chip and the light shines through the sides to some extent, which can be seen from the yellow edge. This reduces the luminance.

If the current is too high, the LED will be destroyed. This was the case at around 20-22 amps, although it should be noted that such high currents are unlikely to be reached when using a FET driver and an 18650/21700 due to the Vf. In this case, the phosphor layer burns and/or the bonding wires burn through, although this only occurs at high voltages. The LED chip is similar in design to the SFT-25R and other round-die LEDs.








  • Maximum reached at 13 A, at this point 3339 lm @ 3.62 V
  • Power at maximum 47.1 W
  • Efficiency at maximum 71 lm/W




Data for 25 °C Tsp (at 85 °C the luminance values are around 13 % lower).


The SFT-42R is about as efficient as an SFT-70 with the same CCT and CRI. In addition, the performance of the SFT-40 is in a similar range. In principle, the SFT-42R is an SFT-40 with a round chip and slightly increased efficiency.

The Vf is quite high at over 3.6 V at maximum current, which should allow operation with direct drive FET drivers.

The round chip probably has slightly poorer heat dissipation, which could be due to the size of the chip – the maximum current is lower than for the SFT-40, despite the same footprint.

The luminance of the SFT-42R is very high, at least at maximum possible current. The SFT-40 has a lower luminance. At lower operating currents (3 A, for example), however, the SFT-25R or an LED with an even smaller luminous area is preferable as long as luminance and thus throw are important.



There are no surprises in the spectrum; the SFT-42R delivers typical cool white light with low color rendering. Typical YAG:Ce3+ phosphor is used.

The tint is greenish and lies just outside the ANSI color space, measured here at 350 mA. As the current increases, the duv decreases slightly, but there is no noticeable tint shift.

The beam is good and the SFT-42R can be used in reflectors without any problems.


  • Ra: 69
  • R9: -39
  • CCT: 6855 K
  • duv: 0.0057

The SFT-42R is the performance-enhanced version of the SFT-25R and is basically the same as the SFT-40, except that it has a round light-emitting surface. The beam is good and the luminance is high, at least as long as the LED is operated with the highest possible current.

As long as the slightly greenish tint and low color rendering are not relevant, this LED is perfectly suitable for higher-power throwers.


Thank you for reading this test. :slight_smile:

Greetings, Dominik


v1.0.2
15 Thanks

This is actually crazy considering that SFT-70 has quite a bit larger LES.

2 Thanks

To be honest I was hoping for a bigger improvement over the SFT40.

1 Thank

The SFT-70 has smaller chips though. These have usually higher Vf and lower light flux due to their size. Basically we compare 4 small chips with a bigger one. Also the SFT-70 I tested should be a lower bin (don’t know exactly, but these were not highest bin)

Yes, the SFT-42R is a nice thrower LED, but nothing special in terms of performance.

1 Thank

In that case making the LHP531 or 73B doesn’t make sense… Yet it worked because LEDs are more efficient at lower currents and in the SFT70 each chips get 1/4 of the current.
You tested SFT70 KB bin which is the highest available.

Of course making these LEDs makes sense. It is very expensive to manufacture really big single chips. (Look at CBT-140 for example)

The advantage of these LEDs with many individual chips is that they can be used to create a large LES at very low cost and with high yield, which is usually accompanied by high luminous flux as well (which is the case for the SFT-70, the light flux is higher as for the SFT-42R). The luminance is not as high though.
I also suspect that the LED chips in the SFT-70 are older than those used today and are therefore somewhat less efficient. This is clearly evident in the old chips used in the SFT-90/SST-50 at the time, they have quite high Vf.

This is achieved using small chips that have a high Vf at high currents, but as these are connected in parallel or in series, this disadvantage is mostly offset.

Btw, for 6500 K the KB bin is second-highest available according to SFT-70 datasheet.

The fact that something exists in the datasheet doesn’t mean it’s actually available.

That’s true altough SFT70 gen2 is not groundbreaking either (+~10%).

It seems that they use different (more modern?) chips in SFT-70 gen2, the curve seem to be slightly different.

Maybe this is a topic for the SFT-70 test.

I see you baked a nice cookie for us

3 Thanks

Thanks for the test! Interesting that it can take less current than sft40, I would’ve guessed it could handle more. Was it tested on the mcpcb as is? I find that sometimes the emitter isn’t reflowed perfectly from convoy and I re reflow them

I wonder how the Cree XM-MR compares to sft42r, XM-MR is rated for higher current at 14A but Vf is much higher unfortunately

No, reflowed it myself on Convoy board.

The XM-MR has really high Vf, pretty sure the 14 A are the maximum possible current while using DTP board.

It’s particularily interesting because SFT40 is even a hair brighter below 4A, SFT42R starts gaining at higher currents.

Simply because the SFT-42R has higher light flux.

It’s funny how people are discussing minimal differences here that ultimately fall within the margin of measurement error. (Not to mention that you can’t even see them with the naked eye.)
A better flux bin alone accounts for more than 7% in some cases.

Except is actually maxxes out at lower current than SFT40.

SFT-42R
2700 lm @ 8A
Luminance 246 cd/mm2 @ 13A (@koef3, what is it at 8A pls? Same as SFT-25R?)

SFT-25R
2000 lm @ 8A
Luminance 215 cd/mm2 @ 8A

Looking good, but for me, the SFT-42R worth waiting for is the 5000k version. Assuming its tint is similar to the beautiful SFT-25R 5000k.

1 Thank

approx. 188 cd/mm2

1 Thank

Thanks for the excellent review. I was going to ask about SFT-42R vs SFT-25R performance, but now I just noticed you’ve pointed it out already :+1:. Noteably, even at higher current, like Convoy M21E with 8A buck driver, SFT-25R would out-throw SFT-42R , right? (And SFT-42R would have larger hotspot and brighter spill.)

SFT-42R
2700 lm @ 8A
Luminance 188 cd/mm2 @ 8A

SFT-25R
2000 lm @ 8A
Luminance 215 cd/mm2 @ 8A

1 Thank

Could be the case, but this depends also on focus (and use of correct centering gasket), reflector, and other variables like heat dissipation, LED flux bin etc.

3 Thanks

Ok so dumb question: is that 14 amps the “peak” or did you cook the emitter at 14 amps? I ask because I have a Convoy L21B with the 20A driver and SFT42r: I don’t run it at 100% all the time but it hasn’t burned up yet. So, while I am aware the 20A doesn’t actually output 20A, does this mean its output is 14A or lower?

1 Thank

Agreed & thanks. I meant in same host such as Convoy M21E (which now has SFT-40 and SFT-25R on same 8A driver AFAIK) or Convoy T8 (same).

During my “write up” of M21E/T8 with SFT-25R I couldn’t help wondering if I will be buying the same light again when SFT-42R 5000k comes out. For me, all things considered the answer is now no since my aim when buying a “throw” LED is (of course) throw.